Pavlakis N

Royal North Shore Hospital

OpenAlex Profile
2
Publications
62
h-index
(16,628 citations, 572 total works)

Research Topics

Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (142)Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (91)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (90)Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (86)Lung Cancer Research Studies (85)

Alpha-gal Syndrome Publications

A protocol for pre-treatment testing for antibodies to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose to mitigate the risk of cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions - a retrospective cohort review.

Della Marta N, Yuile A, Mok C, Wei J, Oatley M, et al.
Cancer treatment and research communications •

Cetuximab improves survival in KRAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer. However, high rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit its use, with HSR rates up to 10-20 %. A major driver of cetuximab HSR is from pre-formed IgE antibody response to galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Evidence from retrospective studies supports alpha-gal pre-screening in this setting. This study reports the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on cetuximab HSR. Records were reviewed across three medical oncology centres that have adopted alpha-gal antibody screening measures. Data for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab were retrieved. All centres assessed alpha-gal levels using the ImmunoCAP® immunoassay. Due to variability in alpha-gal screening practices across study sites, a standardised protocol was applied to all cases. This protocol allowed cetuximab administration if alpha-gal levels were ≤0.10 kUA/L, but prohibited it if alpha-gal levels were >0.10 kUA/L in favour of panitumumab administration. Patients were allocated to either the Alpha-gal Pre-screening Applied ('Pre-screening') or Alpha-gal Pre-screening Not Applied ('Reference') cohorts based on protocol requirements being met. The primary outcome between these patient groups was the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. Of 254 assessable patients, 39 underwent the pre-treatment screening protocol. Of the Pre-screening group, 3% (n=1/39) experienced a cetuximab HSR compared to 16% (n=35/215) in the Reference group (Odds ratio (OR) 0.14; 95% CI 0.0033-0.86, p= 0.02). Patients with alpha-gal antibody titres >0.10 kUA/L were more likely to experience a cetuximab HSR (OR 69.71; 95% CI 5.18-4296.81, p=0.0001). Pre-treatment screening for alpha-gal antibodies significantly reduces the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. A testing threshold of 0.10 kUA/L is effective in identifying patients at risk. Implementing this protocol can improve the safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit cetuximab use in KRAS wildtype advanced colorectal cancer, with a significant driver being pre-formed IgE antibodies against galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Our multicentric retrospective study assessed the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on HSR incidence following cetuximab administration. Of 254 assessable patients, pre-treatment alpha-gal antibody screening significantly reduced the incidence of cetuximab HSRs (3% vs 16%; OR 0.14, p=0.02). Our findings support pre-treatment alpha-gal screening to improve safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.

View on PubMed →DOI →

Increased rates of cetuximab reactions in tick prevalent regions and a proposed protocol for risk mitigation.

Yuile A, Fanuli C, van Nunen S, Diakos C, Clarke S, et al.
Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology •

Cetuximab is an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibody used to treat advanced colorectal cancers. Initial data suggest that severe infusion reactions occurred in 4.5%, many on first exposure. The majority of those with anaphylactic reactions possess predeveloped IgE antibodies to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose. It is thought that the vector for preexposure to alpha-gal is antigen inoculation via tick bites. This retrospective study reviews the experience of two community cancer centers in high tick exposure areas in Sydney with cetuximab anaphylaxis and proposes a protocol to avoid this. Severe cetuximab infusion reactions occurring in the Northern Cancer Institute Frenchs Forest and St Leonards clinics, Sydney, from May 2014 to February 2019 were recorded. Area of residence was then compared to areas of known high tick prevalence. A total of 87 patients received cetuximab in this period. Six patients (6.9%) experienced at least a grade 3 reaction, three females, age range 41-72 years (median 57.5 years). All were receiving cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer and their anaphylaxis occurred with the first infusion in all cases. These cases support the existing theory of increased rates of cetuximab anaphylaxis in areas of high tick prevalence. Given this, we recommend the following protocol for patients being considered for cetuximab therapy: known mammalian meat allergy as an absolute contraindication; all patients receiving cetuximab should have RAST (ImmunoCAP ) testing for alpha-gal specific-IgE-specific antibodies before first infusion and those who test positive to be considered alternate therapy.

View on PubMed →DOI →