Sharma D

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

2
Publications
17
h-index
(955 citations, 65 total works)

Research Topics

Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (26)Blood groups and transfusion (15)Iron Metabolism and Disorders (7)Diversity and Career in Medicine (6)Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5)

Alpha-gal Syndrome Publications

Transfusion-related alpha-gal syndrome: Two new cases expanding the demographic and geographic spectrum, and evidence of a diagnostic gap in allergic transfusion reaction evaluation.

Foster M, Brown M, Mueller A, Tahiri T, Atchison K, et al.
Transfusion •

Transfusion-related alpha-gal syndrome (TRAGS) has recently been proposed as a cause of allergic transfusion reactions (ATRs) in which alpha-gal-specific IgE in sensitized group O (or potentially group A) recipients reacts with epitopes on group B or AB plasma-containing components. Fewer than 10 cases have been reported, all from the Northeast and mid-Atlantic United States, and alpha-gal-specific ATR evaluation practices are unstudied. Two patients with ATRs consistent with TRAGS at a large academic medical center in Nashville, Tennessee are reported alongside a 5-year retrospective cohort analysis of group O and A recipients experiencing ATRs following transfusion of group B or AB plasma-containing products. Alpha-gal IgE testing, AGS diagnosis documentation, and documented consideration of IgA deficiency were assessed for each qualifying reaction. Both index patients had pre-existing AGS diagnoses unrecognized at component selection; one was a 42-year-old female and the second an 83-year-old male. Among 50 qualifying ATRs in 44 patients, including 13 severe or anaphylactic reactions, alpha-gal IgE testing was not performed for any event, and no patient had a documented AGS diagnosis. IgA deficiency was considered in eight patients (18%), yielding no diagnoses. TRAGS occurs in the tick-endemic southeastern United States across a broader demographic range than previously recognized. IgA deficiency, present in <0.3% of the population, was considered in 18% of qualifying patients while alpha-gal sensitization, affecting 20%-30% in this region, was investigated in none. Integration of AGS history into pre-transfusion risk assessment and ATR evaluation protocols is warranted.

Alpha-Gal Syndrome: Unrecognized Risks of a Tick-Bite-Associated Allergy in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.

Jacobs JW, Kaufman RM, Schwartz JY, Hall E, Tahiri T, et al.
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons •

Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to the oligosaccharide galactose-α-1,3-galactose, acquired through tick bites and increasingly recognized as a cause of allergic reactions to mammalian-derived medical products. Every major transplant modality creates distinct conditions under which sensitized patients may encounter alpha-gal, yet AGS knowledge has developed almost entirely outside the transplant literature. In conventional solid organ transplantation, risk arises primarily from perioperative exposures to porcine-derived heparin, gelatin-based hemostatic agents, and other mammalian-derived materials. In xenotransplantation, the well-characterized role of alpha-gal as the principal xenoantigen has driven development of glycoprotein alpha-galactosyltransferase 1-knockout swine, but the distinct IgE-mediated pathway that defines AGS has received little attention. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation introduces questions about conditioning-related immune remodeling of preexisting IgE sensitization, rabbit antithymocyte globulin as an underrecognized alpha-gal exposure, and transfusion-related alpha-gal syndrome when group B or AB plasma-containing blood products are transfused to susceptible patients. Cellular therapy manufacturing workflows that use animal-derived ancillary materials represent a further theoretical exposure pathway. Importantly, detectable anti-alpha-gal IgE does not invariably predict clinical reactivity, and the most appropriate clinical approach is risk stratification rather than reflexive exclusion. Generating the evidence base to support such stratification will require collaboration across allergy, transplant, and transfusion medicine.