Alpha-gal Syndrome (AGS) is a potentially life-threatening allergy caused by an IgE-mediated immune response to galactose-α-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal), a carbohydrate epitope present in most mammalian meats. Currently, strict avoidance of mammalian meat remains the primary management strategy for affected individuals, and alpha-gal-free beef is not commercially available. Here, we leverage cultivated meat as a biotechnology platform to address this unmet clinical need by engineering alpha-gal-free bovine muscle cells. Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, we disrupted GGTA1, the gene encoding α1,3-galactosyltransferase, in immortalized bovine satellite cells (iBSCs). High-efficiency editing produced clonal GGTA1 knockout iBSCs harboring a homozygous frameshift mutation. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence confirmed loss of the alpha-gal epitope, while bulk RNA-seq indicated minimal disruption of global gene expression and preserved myogenic differentiation capacity. Importantly, lysates from GGTA1 knockout iBSCs elicited substantially reduced basophil activation in assays using plasma from a patient with AGS, indicating reduced basophil activation consistent with reduced allergenic potential. Together, these findings establish a proof of concept for engineering AGS-compatible cultivated meat and demonstrate the potential of cultivated meat technologies to address human health challenges.
Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners •
The primary purpose of this study was to determine the rate of infusion reactions to cetuximab in oncology patients treated at the University of North Carolina Cancer Hospital. Secondarily, we sought to evaluate predictors of grade 3-4 hypersensitivity, including geography. Data were collected by retrospective chart review for patients treated with cetuximab at the University of North Carolina Cancer Hospital between 15 November 2006 and 31 December 2010. Data were analyzed for occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction in 125 patients with various cancer types. Of the 125 subjects, 31 (24.8%) experienced an infusion reaction of any grade. Of 125, 18 (14.4%) experienced a grade 3 or 4 reaction. The odds ratio for patients with an allergy history having a grade 3 or 4 reaction was 2.57 (95% CI 0.93 to 7.09, p = 0.07). Pretreatment with steroids was associated with absence of grade 3 or 4 reaction with an odds ratio of 0.21 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.83, p = 0.04). Mapping of reaction rates by county revealed higher rates in some of the more rural counties of North Carolina, however, statistical power was lacking. Rates of hypersensitivity reaction at UNC are similar to rates seen in other areas of the southeastern United States and higher than in other regions of the United States and Europe. Rates of both hypersensitivity reactions and grade 3 to 4 hypersensitivity reactions have not substantially changed over time. Geography, allergy history, and perhaps smoking or cancer type may help predict who will react to cetuximab. Steroids should be strongly considered as premedication in addition to diphenhydramine.