University of Southern Denmark

Longitudinal Follow-up Reveals Peripheral Immunological Changes Upon Tick Bite in α-Gal-Sensitized Individuals.

α-Gal syndrome is characterized by specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies to the carbohydrate galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) and delayed onset of allergic symptoms after ingestion of mammalian meat. While tick bites are assumed to mediate sensitization, the immune response to tick bites has not yet been investigated. Objective: To investigate the peripheral immune response to tick bites in humans over time. In a longitudinal cohort study, immunological reactions associated with tick bites (Ixodes species) were analyzed within 1 day (V1), 2 weeks (V2), 1 month (V3), and 3 months (V4) after the occurrence of a bite. sIgE, sIgG, and sIgG subclass levels, as well as 10 cytokines, were quantified. Deep immune phenotyping was performed using mass cytometry. A total of 4 controls and 10 patients were bitten by a tick and followed up over 3 months. None of the controls developed sIgE to α-Gal, and sIgE increased in all patients from V1 until V2/V3, as did IL-8 levels. We noted a significant increase in CD19+ B cells and B-cell subpopulations, as well as a decrease in γδ CD56+ T cells in patients between V0 and V1. At V1, frequencies of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) and γδ CD56+ T cells were lower in patients than in controls. Our study provides evidence of significant changes in several immune cell populations in α-Gal-sensitized patients, along with increased levels of IL-8 and sIgE. This is the first exploratory study to investigate longitudinal peripheral immune profiles in patients and controls bitten by ticks.

Recurrent tick bites induce high IgG1 antibody responses to α-Gal in sensitized and non-sensitized forestry employees in Luxembourg.

The α-Gal syndrome (AGS) is characterized by the presence of specific IgE-antibodies to the carbohydrate galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal). Sensitization to α-Gal has been associated with tick bites and individuals exposed to ticks have an elevated risk of sensitization. The aim of this study was to analyze IgG and IgE antibody responses to α-Gal in a high-risk cohort of forestry employees (FE) in Luxembourg. Questionnaires and serum samples of FE from Luxembourg (n = 219) were retrospectively analyzed. α-Gal specific IgE was quantified by ImmunoCAP, α-Gal specific IgG and subclasses IgG were determined by ELISA. Additionally, sera from population-based controls (n = 150) and two groups of food-allergic patients, patients with AGS (n = 45) and fish-allergic patients (n = 22) were assessed for IgG antibody responses to α-Gal and cod extract. Twenty-one percent of FE was sensitized to α-Gal (sIgE ≥ 0.1 kU/L). Both sensitized and non-sensitized FE exhibited high levels of α-Gal specific IgG, IgG1 and IgG3 compared with controls, indicating a stimulation of IgG responses by recurrent tick bites, independent of the sensitization status. AGS patients had the highest levels of IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies, whereas the profile of fish-allergic patients was similar to the profile of the controls for which anti-α-Gal responses were dominated by IgG2 antibodies. α-Gal sIgG4 levels were either very low or undetectable in all groups. Our study provides evidence for a continuous stimulation of α-Gal related immune responses by repeated tick bites, translating into highly elevated levels of IgG1 antibodies directed against α-Gal.

α-Gal present on both glycolipids and glycoproteins contributes to immune response in meat-allergic patients.

The α-Gal syndrome is associated with the presence of IgE directed to the carbohydrate galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) and is characterized by a delayed allergic reaction occurring 2 to 6 hours after ingestion of mammalian meat. On the basis of their slow digestion and processing kinetics, α-Gal-carrying glycolipids have been proposed as the main trigger of the delayed reaction. We analyzed and compared the in vitro allergenicity of α-Gal-carrying glycoproteins and glycolipids from natural food sources. Proteins and lipids were extracted from pork kidney (PK), beef, and chicken. Glycolipids were purified from rabbit erythrocytes. The presence of α-Gal and IgE binding of α-Gal-allergic patient sera (n = 39) was assessed by thin-layer chromatography as well as by direct and inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The in vitro allergenicity of glycoproteins and glycolipids from different meat extracts was determined by basophil activation test. Glycoprotein stability was evaluated by simulated gastric and intestinal digestion assays. α-Gal was detected on glycolipids of PK and beef. Patient IgE antibodies recognized α-Gal bound to glycoproteins and glycolipids, although binding to glycoproteins was more potent. Rabbit glycolipids were able to strongly activate patient basophils, whereas lipid extracts from PK and beef were also found to trigger basophil activation, but at a lower capacity compared to the respective protein extracts. Simulated gastric digestion assays of PK showed a high stability of α-Gal-carrying proteins in PK. Both α-Gal-carrying glycoproteins and glycolipids are able to strongly activate patient basophils. In PK and beef, α-Gal epitopes seem to be less abundant on glycolipids than on glycoproteins, suggesting a major role of glycoproteins in delayed anaphylaxis upon consumption of these food sources.

Drugs of porcine origin-A risk for patients with α-gal syndrome?

Anaphylactic Reactions to Novel Foods: Case Report of a Child With Severe Crocodile Meat Allergy.

Availability of "exotic" foods is steadily increasing. In this report, we describe the first case of anaphylaxis to crocodile meat. The patient was a 13-year-old boy with severe immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy to chicken meat. When tasting crocodile meat for the first time, he developed an anaphylactic reaction. Cross-reactivity between chicken and crocodile meat was suspected to have triggered this reaction. Basophil activation and immunoglobulin E testing confirmed the boy's allergic reaction to crocodile meat proteins. Molecular analysis identified a crocodile α-parvalbumin, with extensive sequence homology to chicken α-parvalbumin, as the main cross-reactive allergen. We conclude that crocodile meat can be a potent food allergen and patients with allergy to chicken meat should be advised to avoid intake of meat from crocodile species. Both foods and people travel around the world and accessibility to exotic foods is steadily growing. As a result, novel allergic cross-reactivities are likely to become a challenge in the management of food allergy and, as our report illustrates, cross-reactivity has to be considered even between foods that might not intuitively be perceived as related.

Two galactose-α-1,3-galactose carrying peptidases from pork kidney mediate anaphylactogenic responses in delayed meat allergy.

Serum IgE antibodies directed at galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) are associated with a novel form of delayed anaphylaxis occurring upon consumption of red meat or innards. Pork kidney is known as the most potent trigger of this syndrome, but the culprit allergens have not yet been identified. The aim of this study was the identification and characterization of pork kidney proteins mediating delayed anaphylactic reactions through specific IgE to α-Gal. A cohort of 59 patients with specific IgE to α-Gal was screened by immunoblot for IgE-reactive proteins in pork kidney. Proteins were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting. Isolated proteins were assayed in ELISA and ELISA inhibition, basophil activation and skin prick test. Several IgE-binding proteins of high molecular weight (100- >200 kDa) were detected in pork kidney extracts by immunoblot using patient sera and an anti-α-Gal antibody. Two major IgE-binding proteins were identified as porcine angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE I) and aminopeptidase N (AP-N). Reactivity of patient sera and anti-α-Gal antibody to both proteins was abolished by carbohydrate oxidation. The α-Gal IgE epitopes were resistant to heat denaturation. Pork kidney extract, isolated ACE I, and AP-N were able to activate patient basophils and elicit positive responses in skin prick tests. Two cell-membrane proteins carrying α-Gal epitopes were identified in pork kidney. For the first time, isolated meat proteins were shown to induce basophil activation in patients with delayed anaphylaxis to red meat providing further confirmation for the clinical relevance of these α-Gal-carrying proteins.

Cross-reactivity to fish and chicken meat - a new clinical syndrome.

Fish is one of the most allergenic foods. While clinical cross-reactivity among different fishes is a widely accepted feature of fish allergy, associations with other food allergies are not well understood. This study aims at analyzing the relevance of clinical cross-reactivity between fish and chicken meat in patients with allergy to chicken meat without sensitization to hen's eggs. Patients with food allergy to fish and chicken meat (n = 29) or chicken meat only (n = 7) were recruited. IgE-reactive chicken proteins were identified (Edman, MS analysis) and quantified (ELISA). Allergens were used in IgE ELISA and skin testing. Chicken parvalbumin and two new allergens, aldolase and enolase, were identified at 12, 40, and 50 kDa, respectively. They were recognized by sIgE of 61%, 75%, and 83% of all patient sera which were in the majority of the cases positive for the fish homologues as well. Fish and chicken meat allergens were highly cross-reactive while high inhibition rates with fish or chicken allergens correlated with the patients' primary sensitization to fish or chicken. In cooked or roasted foods, enolase and aldolase were detectable in chicken breast while parvalbumin was detectable in chicken legs and wings. Fish and chicken meat are cross-reactive foods; both fish-allergic and chicken meat-allergic patients might be at risk of developing a food allergy to chicken meat or to fish, respectively. This clinical phenomenon is proposed to be termed 'fish-chicken syndrome' with cross-reactive allergens involved being parvalbumins, enolases, and aldolases.

Biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan as third-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil.

Standard weekly cetuximab and irinotecan (CetIri) is an effective regimen in heavily pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). Inspired by a pharmacokinetic study demonstrating no differences between weekly and biweekly cetuximab, we present the results of 74 consecutive patients treated with biweekly CetIri. Biweekly CetIri schedule: cetuximab 500 mg/m(2), first course was given as a 120-min infusion followed 1 h later by irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) as a 30-min infusion. Subsequent courses of cetuximab were given in 60 min, immediately followed by irinotecan-resulting in an overall treatment time of 90 min. All patients had ACRC resistant to 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan and 95% to oxaliplatin. Median age was 63 years, median performance status was 0. Median duration of therapy was 4.3 months. Response rate was 25%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 months and 8.9 months, respectively, comparable to own historical controls receiving weekly CetIri. Grade 3-4 toxicity was rare (skin 7%, nail 3%, diarrhoea 10%, fatigue 3%, neutropenia 9%). One patient experienced severe allergic reaction. Salvage therapy with simplified biweekly CetIri is a convenient, effective and well-tolerated regimen in heavily pretreated patients with ACRC. A confirmatory phase II study is ongoing.