University of Arizona

educationšŸ“ Tucson, United States
University of Arizona
2
Alpha-gal Syndrome Publications
4
Alpha-gal Syndrome Researchers

Associated Institutions

Arizona's Public Universities
parent
Phoenix Children's Hospital
related
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson
related
Arizona Space Grant Consortium
child
Valleywise Health
related

Publications

Analysis of Acute Hypersensitivity Reactions by Antivenom Type and Geographic Location in the North American Snake Bite Registry (NASBR).

Glaser T, Culbreth R, Liebelt EL, Ruha AM, Greene S, et al.
Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology •

Evidence regarding acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs) to the snakebite antivenoms Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (ovine) (Fab) and Crotalidae Immune F(ab') (equine) (Fab2) supports no differences. However, larger studies may not account for geographic differences. Recent data suggest a correlation with alpha-gal syndrome (AGS). This study investigates the incidence of AHRs in patients receiving Fab2, Fab, or both, with a focus on U.S. states with higher AGS prevalence. This is an analysis of native pit viper envenomations reported to the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR) between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Patients administered Fab2 or Fab on index hospitalization were included. High-AGS and low-AGS regions were defined according to epidemiologic data. The primary outcome was incidence of AHRs after administration of antivenom overall and in high-AGS vs. low-AGS states. Bivariate statistical tests and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for proportions were computed. A total of 1051 patients were identified. Fab2 was administered in 439 cases, and Fab was administered in 722 cases for a total of 1161 cases. Fifty AHRs were analyzed. AHRs were more common with Fab2 (6.6%; 95% CI: 4.6%, 9.3%) compared to Fab (2.9%; 95% CI: 1.9%, 4.4%) in the overall NASBR population (p = 0.004). In low-AGS states, there were 25/421 (5.9%; 95% CI: 4.1%, 8.6%) Fab2 AHRs vs. 16/569 (2.8%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 4.5%) Fab AHRs (p = 0.02). In high-AGS states, the Fab2 group had 4/18 (22.2%; 95% CI: 9.0%, 45.2%) AHRs vs. 5/153 (3.3%; 95% CI: 1.4%, 7.4%) in the Fab group (p = 0.008). In this ToxIC NASBR study, administration of Fab2 was associated with a higher incidence of AHRs compared to Fab. The difference was especially notable in states with a higher prevalence of AGS.

The Tick Microbiome: The "Other Bacterial Players" in Tick Biocontrol.

Maldonado-Ruiz P
Microorganisms •

Hard ticks (family Ixodidae) are one of the most predominant arthropod disease vectors worldwide, second only to mosquitoes. In addition to harboring animal and human pathogens, ticks are known to carry a microbial community constituted of non-pathogenic organisms, which includes maternally inherited intracellular endosymbionts and other environmentally acquired extracellular microorganisms. These microbial communities, which include bacteria, viruses, protozoans, and fungi-with often commensal, mutualistic, or parasitic associations with the tick-comprise the tick microbiome, bacteria being the most studied community. Many bacterial taxa frequently reported in ticks include soil, plant, and animal-associated microbes, suggesting many are environmentally acquired, including members with known entomopathogenic potential, such as , spp., and spp. It has been reported that microbial community composition can impact pathogen persistence, dissemination, and fitness in ticks. In the United States, (northeast) and (west) are the predominant vectors of , the causal agent of Lyme disease. is another important tick vector in the U.S. and is becoming an increasing concern as it is the leading cause of alpha-gal syndrome (AGS, or red meat allergy). This condition is caused by tick bites containing the galactose alpha 1,3 galactose (alpha-gal) epitope in their saliva. In this paper, we present a summary of the tick microbiome, including the endosymbiotic bacteria and the environmentally acquired (here referred to as the community). We will focus on the bacteria from spp. and and discuss their potential for novel biocontrol strategies.