University of Southern California

education📍 Los Angeles, United States
University of Southern California
5
Alpha-gal Syndrome Publications
1
Alpha-gal Syndrome Researchers

Associated Institutions

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
related
Huntington Hospital
related
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
related
LAC+USC Medical Center
related
Keck Hospital of USC
related

Alpha-gal Syndrome Researchers

Publications

Alpha-Gal syndrome as a novel food allergy: a case report study.

Ghelichi-Ghojogh M, Ghezeljeh E, Delavari S, Aghapour SA
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) •

Alpha-Gal syndrome (AGS), a distinct form of mammalian meat allergy, presents unique characteristics that set it apart from typical IgE-mediated food hypersensitivities. AGS induces an allergic response typically 3-6 h post-ingestion of mammalian meat, such as beef, pork, or lamb. This prolonged reaction time differentiates AGS from other food allergies, which usually provoke a more immediate response. The authors present a case of a 35-year-old male patient who, unbeknownst to him, had been experiencing symptoms consistent with Alpha-Gal allergy for several years. His symptoms only subsided upon the complete elimination of mammalian meat from his diet. It was only then that the possibility of AGS was considered. Complete abstinence from mammalian meat, meat by-products, and other α-Gal containing foods is the most effective preventative strategy for AGS. No definitive cure for AGS has been established as of now. Treatment protocols for hypersensitivity reactions are contingent upon the severity of the reaction, with therapies ranging from antihistamine medications to the administration of epinephrine. There is considerable variability among AGS patients concerning the consumption of dairy products. Some individuals with AGS can safely consume dairy products without any adverse reactions, while others are advised to abstain due to potential allergenic responses. This variability in dairy tolerance among AGS patients warrants further investigation.

The safety of monoclonal antibodies for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Berger MD, Lenz HJ
Expert opinion on drug safety •

Monoclonal antibodies such as bevacizumab, ramucirumab, cetuximab and panitumumab play an important role in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With the introduction of these drugs considerable improvements in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were achieved. However these antibodies are associated with a unique side effect profile. This review provides an overview about drug efficacy of bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab and ramucirumab in the treatment algorithm of mCRC. Additionally, we discuss the most common toxicites of these monoclonal antibodies. The most common toxicities associated with the VEGF-A directed antibody bevacizumab are hypertension, proteinuria, thromboembolism, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation and prolonged wound healing. Similarly, the rate of hypertension and proteinuria is increased during treatment with the VEGFR2 antibody ramucirumab. On the other hand the most frequent side effects of EGFR targeted antibodies are skin rash, hypersensitivity reactions and hypomagnesemia. Due to the murine portions of cetuximab the incidence of infusion reactions is more frequent compared to panitumumab which is a pure human monoclonal antibody.

A randomized phase 2 trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin with or without cetuximab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Hussain M, Daignault S, Agarwal N, Grivas PD, Siefker-Radtke AO, et al.
Cancer •

Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression is associated with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Cetuximab (CTX) exhibited an antitumor effect in in vivo UC models. The efficacy of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) with or without CTX in patients with advanced UC was evaluated. Patients with advanced UC, measurable disease, and adequate organ function were randomized 1:2 to cisplatin (70 mg/m(2) ) on day 1 plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) ) on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm A) or GC plus CTX (500 mg/m(2) ) on days 1 and 15 (arm B). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. The secondary endpoints were the response duration, safety, progression-free survival, overall survival, determination of whether or not CTX sensitized nonresponders to GC, and exploratory biomarker analysis. The accrual targets were 27 and 54 patients for the 2 arms, respectively. The overall response rate was reported by arm with binomial confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event endpoints. Eighty-eight eligible patients were randomized; 87 were toxicity-evaluable, and 85 were response-evaluable. The overall response rates were 57.1% for arm A (95% CI = 37%-76%) and 61.4% for arm B (95% CI = 48%-74%). The median progression-free survival times were 8.5 months for arm A (95% CI = 5.7-10.4 months) and 7.6 months for arm B (95% CI = 6.1-8.7 months). The median overall survival times were 17.4 months for arm A (95% CI = 12.8 months to unreached) and 14.3 months for arm B (95% CI = 11.6-22.2 months). The most common grade 3/grade 4 adverse events in both arms were myelosuppression and nausea. Thromboembolism, acneiform rash, fatigue, pain, hypersensitivity reactions, elevated transaminases, hyponatremia, and hypomagnesemia were more common in arm B; 3 grade 5 adverse events occurred in arm B. The presence of primary disease significantly correlated with thromboembolism. An increased soluble E-cadherin level after cycle 2 correlated with a higher risk of death. GC plus CTX was feasible but was associated with more adverse events and no improvements in outcomes.

Management and preparedness for infusion and hypersensitivity reactions.

Lenz HJ
The oncologist •

Like nearly all systemic cancer therapies, monoclonal antibodies are associated with hypersensitivity reactions. This article reviews the characteristics and management of hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies and commonly used chemotherapy agents. MEDLINE was searched for recent studies and reviews pertaining to hypersensitivity reactions with monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab, rituximab, trastuzumab, panitumumab, bevacizumab), platinum compounds (carboplatin, oxaliplatin), and taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel). Emphasis was placed on articles that provided practical information on hypersensitivity reaction management. Data found in the literature were supplemented with information from the package insert for each agent. Severe hypersensitivity reactions are rare, with an incidence of < or =5%, provided patients receive proper premedication, close monitoring, and prompt intervention when symptoms occur. Hypersensitivity reactions to platinum compounds are generally consistent with type 1 hypersensitivity, occurring after multiple cycles of therapy. Reactions to taxanes and monoclonal antibodies produce similar symptoms, but are generally immediate, occurring during the first few minutes of the first or second infusion. However, 10%-30% of reactions to monoclonal antibodies are delayed, and may occur in later infusions, indicating the importance of close observation of the patient following administration. Mild-to-moderate reactions can be managed by temporary infusion interruption, reduction of the infusion rate, and symptom management. Rechallenge should be considered after complete resolution of all symptoms. Severe reactions may require treatment discontinuation. Hypersensitivity or infusion reactions to platinum compounds are acquired; reactions to taxanes and monoclonal antibodies are immediate and typically occur during the first few minutes of the first infusion. The different time of onset should be considered when developing strategies for preventing and managing hypersensitivity reactions. The decision to rechallenge or discontinue treatment after a reaction occurs depends on the severity of the reaction and other clinical factors.

Novel approaches to treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies.

Zhang W, Gordon M, Lenz HJ
Annals of medicine •

The standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is combination of 5- fluorouracil/folinic acid with irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in 70%-80% of colorectal cancers (CRC). EGFR overexpression is known to be involved in carcinogenic processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and metastasis. Monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR have shown antitumor activity and improved the efficacy of chemotherapy. Cetuximab is a chimeric immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (MoAb). Several clinical studies have shown cetuximab, either as a single agent or in combination with irinotecan, having promising efficacy in patients with metastatic CRC. Cetuximab with 5-fluorouracil/LV (leucovorin) plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has shown higher response rate and longer time to progression as first-line treatment of mCRC. Currently, there are no data showing that addition of cetuximab would prolong overall survival in randomized studies. Panitumumab, a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody, has also shown antitumor activity against EGFR-expressing mCRC with less allergic reaction. Anti-EGFR MoAbs are well tolerated and have limited overlapping toxicities in combination with other cytotoxic drugs. The most common side effect of anti-EGFR MoAb is an acneform skin rash, which is a surrogate marker of efficacy of treatment with MoAbs. In this review, we will discuss the use of anti-EGFR MoAbs in the treatment of mCRC, with focus on cetuximab and panitumumab.